The Future of Urban Mobility - Comparing Shared Transportation Systems - Blog No. 127

 

Illustration of the future of urban mobility featuring shared bikes, e-scooters, and public transit in a modern smart city, highlighting sustainable transportation systems without people.


Introduction

Urban life is evolving rapidly, and so is the way we move. From shared bikes to e-scooters and expanded public transit, the shift toward shared transportation systems is transforming our cities. Join me on a journey exploring how these modes compare in adoption, efficiency, and sustainability—and what the road ahead might look like.


1. Rising Stars: Bikes and Scooters on the Fast Track


Over the past few years, shared micromobility—especially bikes and e-scooters—have exploded in popularity. In 2023 alone, users in the U.S. and Canada took 157 million micromobility trips, up 20% from 2022 and surpassing the pre-pandemic peak in 2019.


  • Station-based bike shares surged from 67 million in 2022 to 81 million in 2023.

  • E-scooter trips rebounded strongly—69 million in 2023 compared with 58.5 million in 2022.

  • Dockless e-bikes represent a smaller slice but are growing quickly, with trips rising nearly 50% in the U.S. and quadrupling in Canada.




2. The Price Tag: Affordability Challenges


As micromobility’s popularity climbs, so do concerns about cost.

  • A typical 30–35-minute pay-as-you-go bike trip costs about $3.85.

  • A one-way e-bike ride can top $7.00.

  • Dockless e-scooters and e-bikes average around $6.00 per trip, with peaks of $9–$11 in some cities.


These costs—especially without subsidies—could make micromobility less accessible and slow long-term adoption.




3. Power in Numbers: Can Pricing Sustain Growth?


Though micromobility trips are booming, financial instability looms. In 2023, several cities lost programs overnight due to operator bankruptcies or funding cuts. The vulnerability of privately financed models highlights the urgent need for public funding, sponsorships, and stable financial models to keep services running reliably.




4. Complement, Don’t Compete: Blending Micromobility and Public Transit


What’s exciting is how bikes and scooters can complement the traditional public transit system. Research shows that integrating micromobility with buses, trains, and metros helps solve the first- and last-mile challenge, improves affordability, reduces emissions, and strengthens urban resilience.


In Washington, D.C., for example, about 10% of e-scooter trips were taken to connect with rail services—showing the promise of multi-modal integration.




5. Efficiency Showdown: Which Mode Gets You There Faster?


Speed is another key factor. In Austin, Texas, average speeds showed clear differences:

  • E-bikes clocked in at 3.01–3.44 m/s.

  • E-scooters were slower, at 2.19–2.78 m/s.


E-bikes are measurably faster and more practical for commuting, while scooters excel for short errands and spontaneous trips.




6. Equity Matters: Who Benefits?


Equitable access to mobility is vital. Shared micromobility has shown potential to serve underserved neighborhoods and complement transit and bikesharing. Compared to car-centric models, active and public transport—when paired with shared bikes and scooters—can reduce inequality and widen mobility access.




7. Global View: What Do Major Cities Tell Us?


  • OV-fiets in the Netherlands offers nationwide bike-share integrated with rail, with nearly 6 million rides in 2024.

  • Bixi in Montreal has grown to 11,000 bikes (2,600 e-bikes) and 900 stations, seeing 13 million annual rides in 2024.

  • Divvy in Chicago logged more than 6.6 million rides in 2024 with over 1,000 stations.

  • Capital Bikeshare in Washington, D.C. delivered 6.1 million rides in 2024 across 8,000+ bikes.


These systems illustrate how adoption soars when integrated with public transit and backed by local support.




Bringing It All Together: A Vision for the Future


Efficiency + Speed

  • E-bikes are the quickest micromobility option.

  • E-scooters shine for ultra-short hops but lag in speed.


Adoption & Accessibility

  • Usage is surging, but cost risks limiting growth.

  • Integration with transit and last-mile solutions enhances convenience.


Equity & Inclusion

  • Active and public transport reduce inequality more effectively than private, car-centric models.

  • Shared bikes and scooters can still reach underserved neighborhoods.


Sustainability & Flexibility

  • Shared modes ease congestion and reduce emissions.

  • E-scooters are energy-efficient and flexible.

  • Reliable funding ensures long-term continuity.


Policy & Planning

  • Smart regulation, public investment, and infrastructure (like protected bike lanes) multiply the benefits.

  • European examples show how caps, zoning, and policy support can stabilize services.




Storytelling Snapshot: A Day in the Near Future


Imagine waking up in your city apartment and opening your transit app. You unlock a bright red shared bike and ride two miles to the metro in just 12 minutes. Later, you hop on an e-scooter for the last half-mile stretch through a green park. You arrive at your destination faster than driving would have allowed, with zero emissions along the way.


This is the future of urban mobility: seamless, shared, and sustainable.



Related



Conclusion


Shared bikes, scooters, and public transit aren’t competing—they’re pieces of the same puzzle. Bikes and e-scooters offer speed and flexibility, while public transit delivers scale and affordability. The future lies in integration, equitable pricing, supportive policy, and infrastructure that ties these systems together.


If cities embrace this model, shared transportation can make urban life faster, greener, and more inclusive.




Sources

  • https://nacto.org/publication/shared-micromobility-report-2023/

  • https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/9/3557

  • https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772586324000637

  • https://arxiv.org/abs/2006.04033

  • https://arxiv.org/abs/2103.09060

  • https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/21/14462

  • https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/OV-fiets

  • https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bixi_%28bicycle_share_system%29

  • https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Divvy

  • https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Capital_Bikeshare

  • https://www.wired.com/story/e-scooter-micromobility-infographics-cost-emissions/

  • https://etrr.springeropen.com/articles/10.1186/s12544-024-00634-4



Comments